Yearly,
Jews, both modern and ancient, tell the story of Passover. And yearly, they end
that story describing how Yahweh divided the Red Sea allowing them to come through
the water to their freedom. Through the waters to life, this is how the
symbolism behind baptism has always been described to me.
It
shouldn’t surprise us then to find John the Baptist standing in the Jordan
River bringing people through the water into new life (Jn 1). That is, until
Jesus shows up to be baptized. Immediately, like John, our response is why?
Why is
Jesus requesting to be baptized?
Everyone
else who entered the river that day was being baptized unto repentance, but did
Jesus require this type of baptism? If so, this would have devastating
implications for Christianity, for it would mean that Jesus wasn’t without sin.
This idea, along with its connotations, has led the church for centuries to
describe Jesus’ baptism as merely a symbolic event pointing the cross and his
resurrection. But, is it just symbolism playing itself out as Jesus enters the
water of the Jordan River to be baptized by John, or is there something more
profound going on here?
I think
it’s safe to say that Jesus was not baptized as an affirmation of his repentance,
but rather his baptism was a confirmation of his identity. As Jesus entered the
water of the Jordan River to be baptized by John, John admits he wouldn’t have
known Jesus was “the Son of God,” if not for a dove descending and resting on
him (Jn 1:32). John certainly knew who Jesus was because they were related (Luke
1:36). What is implied in his testimony is that Jesus had not revealed to him
that he was the chosen One of God (Jn 1:31). This raises some interesting
ideas.
If it took
a special revelation to disclose that Jesus was the “Son of God”
What does this say about His humanity?
What does this say about His own
realization that he was God’s chosen one?
What had Jesus done to provoke the
Father's exclamation of pleasure in him at his baptism (Mt 3:17)?
And . . .
What are the implications of this
particular proclamation?
In order
to understand what is being affirmed in Jesus, and what the phrase, “This is my
beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased,” means; we must look at other places
in scripture where the statement is found. The prophet Isaiah declares that the
Lord has chosen a servant, with whom he is pleased
who will establish justice for the whole earth (Is 42:1-4). These verses,
written some 700 years before Jesus, point to a servant who will be cast as a
restored Israel and capable of bringing truth and righteousness to the whole
earth. This was YHWH intention for the nation of Israel, and Jesus, as
representative of an ideally obedient community, has been given the Spirit of
the Lord to bring Israel’s story to fruition. The Father confirms this at
Jesus’ baptism with the declaration of Jesus as his “Son, in whom he is fully
pleased,” and later, Jesus acknowledges the same with his application of Isaiah
61:1-2 to himself (Lk 4:16-21).
It is
significant then that Jesus is said to have been “full of the Spirit” and “led
by the Spirit” in the wilderness to be tempted (Mt 4:1). Whereas Israel was
unable to overcome their testing and rebelled against God in the desert, Jesus
resisted his temptation and declared himself completely dependent on the Father
for everything in the wilderness (more detail about this coming in my next
blog).
No comments:
Post a Comment